Comparison
Growthtyping vs Figma
A Figma mockup is the usual way to float a growth idea. Growthtyping starts from proven patterns, applies your live brand, and produces a real clickable prototype - closer to buildable and more credible in review.
What Figma is built for
Figma is where design happens, and Figma Make adds prompt-to-prototype. It's the default status quo for mocking an idea - but a frame starts from a blank canvas, isn't wired to your live brand system automatically, and is a design artifact, not a real clickable React prototype.
Where Growthtyping is different
Real clickable prototype, not a frame
Output is working React you can click through and export - closer to what will actually get built than a static mock.
On-brand from your live site
Growthtyping pulls your real brand automatically. In Figma you rebuild or re-link your brand system by hand each time.
Starts from evidence-backed patterns
Begin from a growth experiment with rationale attached - so the artifact earns trust in a stakeholder review instead of starting at a blank canvas.
Growthtyping vs Figma, side by side
The bottom line
A Figma mock is fine for a rough idea. When you need something on-brand, clickable, and credible enough to greenlight an experiment, Growthtyping gets you there faster - and exports React on the way out.